Filtrar por:
Tipo de publicación
- Event (4582)
- Artículo (1146)
- Dataset (932)
- Tesis de maestría (764)
- Tesis de doctorado (405)
Autores
- Servicio Sismológico Nacional (IGEF-UNAM) (4582)
- Thomas Payne (298)
- Fernando Nuno Dias Marques Simoes (250)
- Ravi Singh (204)
- Jose Crossa (98)
Años de Publicación
Editores
- UNAM, IGEF, SSN, Grupo de Trabajo (4582)
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (644)
- Cenoteando, Facultad de Ciencias, UNAM (cenoteando.mx) (249)
- Instituto Mexicano de Tecnología del Agua (245)
- El autor (130)
Repositorios Orígen
- Repositorio de datos del Servicio Sismológico Nacional (4582)
- Repositorio Institucional de Datos y Software de Investigación del CIMMYT (682)
- Repositorio institucional del IMTA (665)
- Repositorio Institucional de Publicaciones Multimedia del CIMMYT (426)
- COLECCIONES DIGITALES COLMEX (368)
Tipos de Acceso
- oa:openAccess (8514)
- oa:embargoedAccess (13)
- oa:Computación y Sistemas (1)
Idiomas
Materias
- Sismología (13746)
- CIENCIAS FÍSICO MATEMÁTICAS Y CIENCIAS DE LA TIERRA (5150)
- CIENCIAS DE LA TIERRA Y DEL ESPACIO (4631)
- GEOFÍSICA (4585)
- SISMOLOGÍA Y PROSPECCIÓN SÍSMICA (4584)
Selecciona los temas de tu interés y recibe en tu correo las publicaciones más actuales
Christian Thierfelder (2016, [Dataset])
The objective of this work set is to demonstrate the best options currently available for the management of conservation agriculture (CA) practices in different communities in Mozambique. Eleven communities were selected from the districts of Sofala, Tete and Manica (approximately 100 to 200 families in each community) to host these demonstration sites and six demo fields were installed in each community from 2006-2015 (9 seasons). The treatments in each community were as follows: 1. Farmers' practice (control)- Traditional management with removal of stubble. 2. Conservation agriculture- The stubble is kept in the ground, there is no preparation of the ground, and the sowing is done manually in covachos previamento open (see the management of the covachos) and with SULCADOR in Nhamatiquite. 3. Direct sowing (SD): The stubble is kept in the soil, the direct sowing is done with Matraca or sharp bread.
1st to 23rd Elite Selection Wheat Yield Trial
Ravi Singh Thomas Payne (2017, [Dataset])
The Elite Selection Wheat Yield Trial (ESWYT) is a replicated yield trial that contains spring bread wheat (Triticum aestivum) germplasm adapted to Mega-environment 1 (ME1) which represents the optimally irrigated, low rainfall areas. Major stresses include leaf, stem and yellow rusts, Karnal bunt, and lodging. Representative areas include the Gangetic Valley (India), the Indus Valley (Pakistan), the Nile Valley (Egypt), irrigated river valleys in parts of China (e.g. Chengdu), and the Yaqui Valley (Mexico). This ME encompasses 36 million hectares spread primarily over Asia and Africa between 350S -350N latitudes. White (amber)-grained types are preferred by consumers of wheat in the vast majority of the areas. It is distributed to upto 200 locations and contains 50 entries.
International Durum Yield Nursery genotyping-by-sequencing data
Karim Ammar Thomas Payne (2017, [Dataset])
International Durum Yield Nurseries are replicated yield trials designed to measure the yield potential and adaptation of superior CIMMYT-bred spring durum wheat germplasm that have been developed from tests conducted under irrigation and induced stressed cropping conditions in northwest Mexico. These materials have been subjected to numerous diseases (leaf, stem and yellow rust; Septoria tritici blotch) and varied growing environments. It is distributed to 70 locations, and contains 50 entries.
47th International Durum Yield Nursery
Karim Ammar Thomas Payne (2018, [Dataset])
International Durum Yield Nurseries are replicated yield trials designed to measure the yield potential and adaptation of superior CIMMYT-bred spring durum wheat germplasm that have been developed from tests conducted under irrigation and induced stressed cropping conditions in northwest Mexico. These materials have been subjected to numerous diseases (leaf, stem and yellow rust; Septoria tritici blotch) and varied growing environments. It is distributed to 70 locations, and contains 50 entries.
TAMASA Ethiopia. Variety phenology calibration dataset, 2016
MESFIN KEBEDE DESTA Henri TONNANG (2017, [Dataset])
Experiments at five locations (Dedessa, Uke, Bako, Ambo, Holleta) in Ethiopia on an altitude gradient (1231 to 2351 m) to calibrate development or phenology of 20 maize varieties. There were two to three sowing dates at each location. Observations include dates of emergence, tassel, silking and maturity; biomass and grain yields.
43rd International Durum Screening Nursery
Karim Ammar Thomas Payne (2017, [Dataset])
International Durum Screening Nursery (IDSN) distributes diverse CIMMYT-bred spring durum wheat germplasm adapted to irrigated and variable moisture stressed environments. Disease resistance and high industrial pasta quality are essential traits possessed in this germplasm. It is distributed to 100 locations, and contains 150 entries.
Peter Craufurd (2017, [Dataset])
This dataset was obtained from maize Crop cut survey conducted in 2015 by EIAR and CIMMYT. Replicated crop cuts of 16m2 in farmers fields along with addition data on nutrient use and variety, and soil sample (0-20, 20-50 cm). Note that not all soil samples have been analysed yet.
CIMMYT Maize Regional Trial Data for Eastern Africa 2017
MacDonald Jumbo Yoseph Beyene Dan Makumbi Lewis Machida Suresh L.M. Amsal Tarekegne Manje Gowda Vijay Chaikam Prasanna Boddupalli (2020, [Dataset])
The summary results of the Regional Trials for CIMMYT Maize Hybrids in Eastern Africa for 2017. The trials include: EHYB17-Set I – Early/extra-early maturing elite pre-commercial hybrids regional trials (including external and internal checks); IHYB17-Set I – Intermediate maturing elite pre-commercial hybrids regional trial (including external and internal checks); ILHYB17 – Intermediate-Late maturing elite pre-released and released hybrids regional trials (including external and internal checks); EHYB17-Set II – Early maturing elite pre-commercial hybrids regional trials; ILHYB17 Set II – Intermediate/late maturing elite pre-commercial hybrids regional trials.
Susanne Dreisigacker Karim Ammar (2020, [Dataset])
We characterized a panel of 151 durum wheat Mediterranean landraces and 20 modern cultivars via a series of molecular markers associated with Vrn-1 and Ppd-1 genes. The molecular data were used estimate the effects of the observed alleles on the time needed to reach six different growth stages under field conditions. Field experiments were carried out over six years in Lleida, northeastern Spain.
Sivakumar Sukumaran Jose Crossa Carlos Jara Marta Lopes Matthew Paul Reynolds (2016, [Dataset])
Increases in genetic gains in grain yield can be accelerated through genomic selection (GS). In the present study seven genomic prediction models under two cross validation scenarios were evaluated on the Wheat Association Mapping Initiative population of 287 advanced elite lines phenotyped for grain yield (GY), thousand grain weight (GW), grain number (GN), and thermal time for flowering (TTF) in 18 environments (year location combinations) in major wheat producing countries in 2010 and 2011. The seven genomic prediction models tested herein: four of them (model 1 (L+E), model 2 (L+E+G), model 3 (L+E+A) , and model 4 (L+E+A+G )) with main effects (lines (L), environme nts (E), genetic relationship matrix (G), and pedigree derived matrix (A) and three of them (model 5 (L+E+A+AE), model 6 (L+E+G+GE), and model 7 (L+E+G+A+AE+GE)) with interaction effects between A×E, G×E, and both together with main effects. Moreover, two cross validation (CV) schemes were applied: (1) predicting lines’ performance at untested sites (CV1) and (2) predicting the lines’ performance at some sites with the performance from other sites (CV2). The genomic prediction models with interaction terms, models 6 and 7 had the highest prediction accuracy on average for CV1 for GY (0.31), GN (0.30), and model 5 for TTF (0.26). Models 3 and 7 2, were the best model for GW (0.45 each) under CV1 scenario. For CV2, the prediction accuracy was generally high for the model with interaction terms models 5, 6, and 7 for GY (0.39), model 5 and 7 for GN (0.43. For GW and TTF models prediction accuracy were similar. Results indicated genomic selection can be used to predict genotype by environment (G×E) interaction in multi environment trials to select varieties for release as well as for accelerated breeding.